,_2008,_Sylvester_Stallone_resize.jpg)
The remake of the classic Nightmare on Elm Street audience will sway the opinion of the movie itself. If you were lucky enough to either see the original first hand, or to read the original book, this remake may leave you less than impressed. Seeing the first one, first hand, no doubt left you shaky and haunted for years to come, and although the graphics and the technology for the remake make the adaptation of the book come alive visually. The psyche of the original will never be able to be remade for those of us who experienced it back in the day.
Although the remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street is a step above Jason or Michael Myers, it was never really about the visual stimulation limitations of the movie characters, but it was always about the plot and the disturbing nature of adding in imagination. Where this movie makes up for being able to bring the images to life, it robs from your own imagination.
Almost like reading the book versus watching the movie, any new remake of this original can never parallel the original terror that it invoked on an entire generation of movie-gowers.
The Freddy Kruger of new lacks one main ingredient, he fails to be scary. Unlike the original, he appears to be nothing but a sarcastic character who, albeit very unlikeable, is not the original horror character that Wes Craven created. The Freddy Kruger from he original was the kind that haunted peoples nightmares for real when they left the theater. This new character is left sitting in the theater as the audience leaves. The new Freddy Kruger is nothing but an overgrown pedophile who is creepy and sarcastic, anything but truly scary. Unlike the original, there were no audience screams, there was no sitting on the edge of your seat, there was no emotional attachment to this Freddy Kruger, he was just another villain among thousands.
Although hard to pinpoint why, either because nothing can ever be as scary as the original, or the hype was made too great, this new Nightmare on Elm Street can do nothing to parallel the original. In the scheme of cinematography legends, this will not find it’s place. The Nightmare on Elm Street that kept a whole generation up at night should have remained just that, an original.
Popularity: 14% [?]
Of all the mega-budget superhero movies that Hollywood has produced, Iron-Man although being slick and fun humored, can not compare to franchises such as superman, batman or spiderman. Although entertaining enough, and definitely having the hype of the later, Iron man as a character even with it’s metal suit, falls short.
Being that the original “Clash of the Titans” produced in 1981 was meant for no great honors, it should be no surprise that it’s remake followed closely in its footsteps. The addition of the technological advance of 3D, makes this version not only less attractive, but more, it produces more distraction. Possibly because the film was only converted to 3D later on, the third dimension not only does nothing to enhance the visuals, but only serves to make it less appealing.
Positives: The idea is an oldie but at the same time a goodie; 4 guys makes it to the 
Summertime is a 2010 English film directed and written by Max Weissberg. The film involves 8 principal characters from eight different professions. There exists an actress, a painter, a thinker, a photographer and so on. 
